April 01, 2004

How not to react to a security vulnerability 101

Another software company's claims of quality and security have been debunked by a part time security researcher (he's a biologist at Harvard.)

Instead of dealing the problem by fixing the vulnerability or providing a technical response to the claim (like most large and grown up software companies,) Tegam has decided to sue the offending researcher.

Observe as this incident turns into another a text book case on turning a software flaw into a bonafide PR disaster.

Posted by Abner on April 1, 2004 10:40 AM
Comments ARE BROKEN Send email instead - Thanks!


Recent Entries
iPhone's SIM Locks: Hardware vs. Software vs. Lawyers
Even (or especially) contests could use a security review
Vendors Responses: Voting Machines and the Pwnie Awards
Dude "Security Rocks"
iPhone Wi-Fi Vulnerability
Harry Potter Security
iPhone Hacking & Fustrations
Let the iPhone Hacking Begin
Geer heads to Washington, Again
This Just In: DRM still doesn't work
L0pht
Phishing meets Internet Advertising
How long to unlock the iPhone Operating System?
Predictive Markets For Politics
The Irony of Phone Security Google Ads
Why Biometric Fingerprint Readers Are A Waste
How to Blag an Interview
Yet another Boston marketing flub
MAC vs. Vista Security
The latest in physical security
Data Loss Archive
Guerrilla Marketing Backfires in Boston
Hackistan
NY Times on the "Market" For Software Vulnerabilities
Not marketing security, marketing *during* security